That is correct, but I could imagine he (and others) are confused by the fact that the buildroot does not generate a pico-m image, just a bullet-, nano-m, and a rocket-m. The bullet-m image will work on the pico-m, but there is nothing that tells users.
Another 'not-so-nice-thing' by the way is the nano-m image is generated as a 1-port network device. Unlike the b/g nano the nano-m is a two port device and should be equipped with an eth0 and eth1 interface out of the box. The firmware only sets up the eth0 interface (see https://dev.openwrt.org/browser/trunk/target/linux/ar71xx/base-files/etc/uci -defaults/network - all ubnt devices other than routerstations are set up as bullet-m). -----Original Message----- From: openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org] On Behalf Of Outback Dingo Sent: Wednesday, 15 February 2012 4:22 a.m. To: OpenWrt Development List Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] UBNT PicoStation M2 and M5 Available? On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 10:21 AM, Yeoh Chun-Yeow <yeohchuny...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, all > > Support for UBNT PicoStation M2 and M5 available now? It has been for.... at least a year or more.... > > Regards, > Chun-Yeow > > _______________________________________________ > openwrt-devel mailing list > openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel > _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
