On 2012-01-24 3:57 PM, Brian J. Murrell wrote: > On 12-01-24 08:06 AM, Jonathan McCrohan wrote: >> >> I also see svn as part of the problem. I think a move towards the >> linux-kernel development model would be a great benefit. > > I hate sending simple "me too" posts, but to help demonstrate that there > is demand for this, I too would welcome a move to git from SVN. Probably not going to happen for the main repo. Some developers like to stay with SVN. Right now I don't see a point in pushing for a complete switch to git, since the svn<->git integration is working just fine.
So guys, let's keep this discussion on topic. The proposed-changes repo is of course going to be a git repo, but the main repo stays with svn. Let's focus the discussion on how the proposed-changes repo should be maintained, who should do it, and how the patch team will organize. If you feel like you absolutely must send your 'me too' mails on the switch-to-git topic, please pick a different thread for that. :) - Felix _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
