-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi.
> I need a same kind of magic to overcome this problem. > Is there any? Yes, patch scripts/config.sub - that is whats fored upon each package. > Is the behavior of "Modifying a generic build tool during a build > process for a single target" considered legitimate? Modifying the generic build tool to accept a new platform is certainly legitimate, nobody wants to patch a new CPU definition into each single package. > Wouldn't it introduce some unexpected side effects? Its autohell so nobody can tell :) ~ Jow -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk8cVnkACgkQdputYINPTPOmHQCeK+HDFGdXAfX8QjM4trm9B1uM RDoAoIB1Gu3rRoaRs3OVkviYxsET6qLx =7I17 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
