On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:27:26PM +0000, Lee Essen wrote: > On 18 Jan 2012, at 22:04, Luka Perkov <open...@lukaperkov.net> wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 01:22:10PM +0000, lee.es...@nowonline.co.uk wrote: > I'm not sure I understand what you mean? If this script didn't look for > pppoa interfaces then it would try to bring up any 'down' interfaces when the > DSL line came up, and more worryingly it would take every interface down when > the link went down. > > My understanding is that you either use a br2684 bridge (for pppoe based DSL > providers) or pppoa for native pppoa DSL providers (although I've no > experience of the bridge option so I am making some assumptions.) > > In the bridge case the ppp link comes up as part of the hotplug mechanism, > but for pppoa you need to trigger it as per the patch. So I'm not sure why > you would look at non pppoa interfaces? In fact the code is mostly copied > from the hotplug atm script to ensure the behaviour is as similar as possible.
I was wrong. I'll try and test your patch tomorrow or this weekend... Luka _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel