Great - this is good news :-) I will of course test these patches, and if there 
is anything I can do to help get them into the trunk then I will do so.
Thanks,
Matt

-----Original Message-----
From: openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org 
[mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org] On Behalf Of Peter Naulls
Sent: 10 November 2011 16:21
To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Buffalo wzr-hp-g300nh2

On 11/10/2011 08:13 AM, Mark Deneen wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Peter Naulls<pe...@chocky.org>  wrote:
>> On 11/10/2011 05:59 AM, Ben Pfountz wrote:
>>>
>>> I would like to see support in trunk as well. In the meantime I have been
>>> using
>>> the patch Mark Deneen created, which adds support for everything except
>>> some of
>>> the LEDs and switches, see his email and thread for more info...
>>>
>>> https://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2011-August/011901.html
>>
>> We have been using these patches for months on many devices.  See my
>> addition patch to allow the same kernel to work on both the nh and nh2.
>> I'd like to see the additional LED support too, but not sure I can
>> justify the time to do it myself right now.
>
> If I clean up the common mtd code between the various boards which
> concat two partitions together, can we get this applied?

I'll test any such patches of course.  As an additional note, we're
going to need the same thing on a300gh, since I'm getting one of those
in next few days.  I'll submit any work on that here, even if it's
decided not to use it.


_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Reply via email to