On 6/22/11 11:02 AM, Alexey I. Froloff wrote: > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 09:15:24AM -0700, Philip Prindeville wrote: >> The warning only seems to be for line 369, so why change more than that? > This is a modification of an older patch. tag.reserved2 (now) is > 16 bytes long, so it's OK. > >> Also, what value does sizeof(tag.information1[0]) give? > It doesn't matter. Compiler knows that tag.information1 is > TAGINFO1_LEN bytes long, which is less than ALTTAGINFO_LEN. This > is how _FORTIFY_SOURCE works in gcc...
Ok, so it sounds like the best fix would be: strlcpy(&tag.information1[0], args->altinfo_arg, TAGINFO1_LEN); Is that correct? _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
