On Wednesday 27 April 2011 21:54:49 Maxim Osipov wrote: > On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Hauke Mehrtens <ha...@hauke-m.de> wrote: > > On 04/27/2011 09:05 PM, Maxim Osipov wrote: > >> Hello! > >> > >> Any comments for this patch? Is it possible to apply it? > >> > >> Kind regards, > >> Maxim > >> > >> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Maxim Osipov <maxim.osi...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> Signed-off-by: Maxim Osipov <maxim.osi...@gmail.com> > >>> --- > >>> target/linux/at91/Makefile | 2 +- > >>> .../at91/flexibity/base-files/etc/config/dhcp | 27 + > >>> .../at91/flexibity/base-files/etc/config/network | 20 + > >>> .../at91/flexibity/base-files/etc/config/system | 8 + > >>> .../flexibity/base-files/etc/config/transmission | 62 + > >>> .../base-files/etc/init.d/custom-user-startup | 22 + > >>> target/linux/at91/flexibity/config-2.6.37 | 2514 > >>> ++++++++++++++++++++ target/linux/at91/flexibity/image/Makefile > >>> | 27 + > >>> target/linux/at91/flexibity/target.mk | 16 + > >>> 9 files changed, 2697 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > >>> create mode 100644 > >>> target/linux/at91/flexibity/base-files/etc/config/dhcp create mode > >>> 100644 target/linux/at91/flexibity/base-files/etc/config/network > >>> create mode 100644 > >>> target/linux/at91/flexibity/base-files/etc/config/system create mode > >>> 100644 target/linux/at91/flexibity/base-files/etc/config/transmission > >>> create mode 100755 > >>> target/linux/at91/flexibity/base-files/etc/init.d/custom-user-startup > >>> create mode 100644 target/linux/at91/flexibity/config-2.6.37 > >>> create mode 100644 target/linux/at91/flexibity/image/Config.in > >>> create mode 100644 target/linux/at91/flexibity/image/Makefile > >>> create mode 100644 target/linux/at91/flexibity/target.mk > > > > Hi Maxim, > > > > I do not have this board or any other board supported by the at91 > > target, so I am unable to test anything, but I have some questions. > > > > Why did you create a new subtarget and why didn't you integrate > > flexibity into one of the existing subtargets? > > Why does the flexibity subtarget use kernel 2.6.37, but the other > > subtargets are using 2.6.38? > > > > Hauke > > Hi Hauke, > > The boards are different - so different devices, config, modules, etc. > The same with base-files customisation - it cannot be shared with > other hardware. Regarding the kernel - I've chosen the most used in > OpenWRT kernel version where my patches are already included. 2.6.38 > doesn't build for me yet and I don't want too many experimental > things.
Please use a profile for this instead of a completely separate target. If your profile requires a different kernel configuration, then let profiles also supply their specific kernel configuration. -- Florian _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
