fair enough.. bud On 28.03.2011 19:44, Gregers Petersen wrote: > Dear All > > I've been following the discussion and would like to offer to organize > an irc meeting on -devel - to discuss this issue, and together generate > a model for how to change things to the better. > > I would like to suggest that everyone joins -devel on irc this next > sunday at 19:00 UTC to discuss the topic. > > Sincerely > > Gregers Petersen > > > > On 26/03/11 23:43, Philip Prindeville wrote: >> I'm not sure that qualifies as a sure-fire method. I picked up a few >> packages and updated them, but still didn't hear back about my request >> for commit rights or ownership of x86-platform stuff. >> >> I agree with one of the other responders that it would be nice to have a >> more ordered and methodical way of dealing with submitted patches, >> perhaps triaging them and responding in the FIFO fashion. >> >> -Philip >> >> >> On 3/24/11 1:43 PM, Travis Kemen wrote: >>> Currently the best way for people to join (and help) the project is to >>> take up maintenance of a package (or a few packages). I put out a call >>> a while back for people to help with this and did get some replies but >>> there are still many unmaintained packages as >>> https://home.comcast.net/~sdwalker/uscan/index.html >>> <https://home.comcast.net/%7Esdwalker/uscan/index.html> shows. >>> >>> Travis >>> >>> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Luka Perkov <open...@lukaperkov.net >>> <mailto:open...@lukaperkov.net>> wrote: >>> >>> Dear OpenWrt developers and other openwrt-devel readers, >>> >>> first I would like to express my gratitude to the current OpenWrt >>> developers for all the work they did to keep up and running this >>> project >>> on many embedded devices. You must have spent many long hours >>> contributing to this project and not for example spending quality >>> time >>> with your girlfriends / boyfriends... :) >>> >>> But I must notice as occasional project participant that this project >>> could benefit a lot more than it does now from people like myself. >>> I say >>> this mainly because of the large number of non replied patches >>> posted on >>> this list. That's why I have chosen this subject. >>> >>> Maybe there is a reason I am not aware of why OpenWrt is relatively >>> closed community, but I think that involving some fresh blood in this >>> project could help. At least with answering to the rejected patches. >>> >>> Surely, current OpenWrt developers would "lose" some time to help the >>> new guys starting up, but in the long run it would be time well >>> spent. >>> >>> Best of luck to the OpenWrt project, >>> Luka Perkov >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> openwrt-devel mailing list >> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org >> https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel >
_______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
