Felix Fietkau wrote: > Scratch that, got confused by the delay slot for a second there :) > I see the code that adds the wrong bits now, I wonder if there's > something wrong with signed vs unsigned type propagation... > I'll let you know when I find out more about this.
I agree that signed/unsigned confusion may play a role. Things fall apart when Linaro emits li v0,-16384; -16384 is 0xffffc000. Everything would be fine if the immediate value were 0xc000 instead. _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
