Hi Jan, On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 01:21:40PM +0100, Jan Willies wrote: > > 2011/2/23 Martin Mueller <m...@sig21.net>: > > I added support for the seagate GoFlex Net/Home to the dockstar > > target. The kernel will get slightly larger, but I think this is > > acceptable on this platform, since it has enough resources. > > That's great! I guess that'd be a huge performance boost to the > Dockstar since no USB is involved anymore, if I read the product page > right.
Yes I'm quite satisfied with the performance: root@OpenWrt:/# for i in sda sdb md0 ; do hdparm -tT /dev/$i ; done /dev/sda: Timing cached reads: 432 MB in 2.00 seconds = 215.58 MB/sec Timing buffered disk reads: 252 MB in 3.02 seconds = 83.38 MB/sec /dev/sdb: Timing cached reads: 428 MB in 2.00 seconds = 213.96 MB/sec Timing buffered disk reads: 254 MB in 3.01 seconds = 84.49 MB/sec /dev/md0: Timing cached reads: 418 MB in 2.00 seconds = 208.89 MB/sec Timing buffered disk reads: 246 MB in 3.00 seconds = 81.97 MB/sec > Do you happen to know whether the GoFlex Net has the same crypto > hardware acceleration as the Dockstar > (http://wiki.openwrt.org/toh/seagate/dockstar#crypto.hardware.acceleration), > ie is it common about the Kirkwood SoCs? Yes it is and it works just like on the dockstar. Performance is not the best as the mv_cesa still doesn't use DMA. Unfortunatelly this seems out of my knowledge to implement it, but it would be nice. root@OpenWrt:/# hdparm -t /dev/mapper/crypt /dev/mapper/crypt: Timing buffered disk reads: 40 MB in 3.03 seconds = 13.19 MB/sec > > --- target/linux/kirkwood/config-default (revision 25666) > > +++ target/linux/kirkwood/config-default (working copy) > > @@ -71,7 +71,10 @@ > > # CONFIG_I2C_MV64XXX is not set > > CONFIG_INET_LRO=y > > CONFIG_INITRAMFS_SOURCE="" > > -# CONFIG_IP_ADVANCED_ROUTER is not set > > +CONFIG_IP_ADVANCED_ROUTER=y > > +CONFIG_IP_MROUTE=y > > +CONFIG_IP_MULTIPLE_TABLES=y > > +CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_FWMARK=y > > Why is this needed? I'm sorry this is not needed. It's just what I added since I did some fancy DSL-routing on the device. It can be left out (but it doesn't hurt either). bye MM -- A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
