I'll try to find the range for PowerStation/Pro but it is not so simple ;-(
Anyway UBNT M-Series devices have 2 MACs in EEPROM so patch part for
M-Series should be OK in general.
@@ -225,15 +236,16 @@
static void __init ubnt_m_setup(void)
{
- u8 *mac = (u8 *) KSEG1ADDR(0x1fff0000);
+ u8 *mac1 = (u8 *) KSEG1ADDR(0x1fff0000);
+ u8 *mac2 = (u8 *) KSEG1ADDR(0x1fff0000+ETH_ALEN);
u8 *ee = (u8 *) KSEG1ADDR(0x1fff1000);
ar71xx_add_device_m25p80(NULL);
ar71xx_add_device_mdio(~0);
- ar71xx_init_mac(ar71xx_eth0_data.mac_addr, mac, 0);
- ar71xx_init_mac(ar71xx_eth1_data.mac_addr, mac, 1);
+ ar71xx_init_mac(ar71xx_eth0_data.mac_addr, mac1, 0);
+ ar71xx_init_mac(ar71xx_eth1_data.mac_addr, mac2, 0);
ar71xx_eth0_data.phy_if_mode = PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_MII;
ar71xx_eth0_data.speed = SPEED_100;
ar71xx_eth0_data.duplex = DUPLEX_FULL;
Regards,
//keba
On 12/09/2010 07:34 PM, Gabor Juhos wrote:
2010.12.06. 9:19 keltezéssel, Kestutis Barkauskas írta:
There is Secondary MAC address duplicate problem with some UBNT
RouterStation and RouterStation Pro HW batches as Primary MAC addresses
are not increased by 2 per device in board data. Fix is to use 'Locally
Administrated bit' for Secondary MAC address instead of increasing
Primary MAC addresses by 1 which could overlap with other device Primary MAC
address.
It would be possible to know the exact MAC address ranges? Then we would be able
to apply the workaround for the affected boards only.
Regards,
Gabor
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
