Hi, On Mon, 01 Nov 2010 22:17:11 +0100, Marcus Osdoba <marcus.osd...@googlemail.com> wrote:
The patches for the dockstar won't break history and they do not introduce new features, so they are quite harmless. Is there any chance to commit them to the current trunk?
I'm surprised squashfs works for you, as it lacks nand support. For real, kirkwood should be moved to ubifs or (for a combined layout) squashfs+ubifs (over ubi). The whole jffs2 thing is stupid. For the bootloader part, things have to be changed a lot. Command line partition parsing is lame, the second stage bootloader (if it's really needed) should do what it's purpose, load a kernel, and the kernel should take care about partitioning.
Is svn diff ok, or do you prefere git format-patch?
I prefer svn diff.
btw: mv_cesa should rely on crypto_aes like kmod-crypto-hw-padlock: https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/7643
I'll take a look at that later. Regards, Imre _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
