Hi Gianfranco, Le vendredi 12 mars 2010 23:18:32, Gianfranco Bauco a écrit : > This patch add support Alice Gate W2+ (also referred as AliceV3_S1 or > "Vela"), Broadcom bcm63xx-based routers, distributed in Italy by Telecom. > Unfortunately the fylesystem inizialization occurring during the first > boot make subsequent boot-ups fail because of a bad CRC of the flash image > (problem known already > https://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2009-August/004815.html > ). Of course DSL is NOT working. > > Signed-off-by: Gianfranco Bauco > > Index: target/linux/brcm63xx/patches-2.6.32/099-cfi_probe_error.patch > =================================================================== > --- > target/linux/brcm63xx/patches-2.6.32/099-cfi_probe_error.patch > (revision > 0) +++ > target/linux/brcm63xx/patches-2.6.32/099-cfi_probe_error.patch > (revision > 0) @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ > +--- a/drivers/mtd/chips/gen_probe.c > ++++ b/drivers/mtd/chips/gen_probe.c > +@@ -127,9 +127,9 @@ > + * chip in read mode. > + */ > + > +- for (i = 1; i < max_chips; i++) { > ++ /*for (i = 1; i < max_chips; i++) { > + cp->probe_chip(map, i << cfi.chipshift, chip_map, &cfi); > +- } > ++ }*/ > +
Why is this patch required? Cannot you find a better way not to break other
Flash chips?
> + /*
> + * Now allocate the space for the structures we need to return to
> Index: target/linux/brcm63xx/patches-2.6.32/131-board_AG3.patch
> ===================================================================
> --- target/linux/brcm63xx/patches-2.6.32/131-board_AG3.patch (revision 0)
> +++ target/linux/brcm63xx/patches-2.6.32/131-board_AG3.patch (revision 0)
> @@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
> +Index: linux-2.6.32.9/arch/mips/bcm63xx/boards/board_bcm963xx.c
> +===================================================================
> +--- linux-2.6.32.9/arch/mips/bcm63xx/boards/board_bcm963xx.c (revision
> 20072) ++++
> linux-2.6.32.9/arch/mips/bcm63xx/boards/board_bcm963xx.c (working copy)
> +Index:
> target/linux/brcm63xx/files-2.6.30/arch/mips/bcm63xx/boards/board_bcm963xx
> .c +@@ -470,6 +470,26 @@
> + .force_duplex_full = 1,
> + },
> + };
> ++
> ++static struct board_info __initdata board_alicev3_s1 = {
> ++ .name = "Alice Gate W2+",
> ++ .expected_cpu_id = 0x6348,
> ++
> ++ .has_enet0 = 1,
> ++ .has_enet1 = 1,
> ++ .has_pci = 1,
> ++
> ++ .enet0 = {
> ++ .has_phy = 1,
> ++ .use_internal_phy = 1,
> ++ },
> ++ .enet1 = {
> ++ .force_speed_100 = 1,
> ++ .force_duplex_full = 1,
> ++ },
> ++
> ++ .has_ohci0 = 1,
> ++};
> + #endif
> +
> + /*
> +@@ -696,6 +716,7 @@
> + &board_DV201AMR,
> + &board_96348gw_a,
> + &board_rta1025w_16,
> ++ &board_alicev3_s1,
> + #endif
> +
> + #ifdef CONFIG_BCM63XX_CPU_6358
>
>
This part looks good.
Please rework the CFI part of the patch, as I think it has side effects for
other brcm63xx routers and resend the patch as a text, not HTML.
Thank you
--
Florian
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
