puchu <rauchwo...@gmx.net> writes:
> hi,
>
> please dont delete shorewall common and shell .... this shorewall
> packages are still the default on most distributions and they dont
> have a known bug and it is possible to use them on a system where no
> perl is avaibable.... newer versions of shorewall-common can only be
> used on systems with perl installed. maybe a rename to
shorewall-shell has been removed in shorewall 4.4 so shorewall-common
and shorewall-perl have been merged into shorewall. I've not included
shorewall (and shorewall6) in my patch because I can't test it as I
don't build perl. Moreover these packages are not required on the device
to have a firewall controlled by shorewall.
I considered just leaving the shorewall packages as they are and adding
shorewall-lite4.4, but that would cause way too much confusion with
shorewall6 and I didn't need the old versions for myself anyway.
Matthew
--
I must take issue with the term "a mere child", for it has been my
invariable experience that the company of a mere child is infinitely
preferable to that of a mere adult.
-- Fran Lebowitz
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
