the old version used glib1, now irssi is glib2 only ... so its a little bit bigger .... compare glib1 to glib2 thats the difference ...
irssi-old i think is a nice name ... maybe u could describe it in more detail in the description greets Am Dienstag 27 Januar 2009 12:03:51 schrieb [email protected]: > yo bartman, > > 1) what is the footprint of 0.8.10 > 2) what deps are there ? and can we kill some of them > > blogic > > Quoting Andy Boyett <[email protected]>: > > Looks good so far, but 0.8.12's dependency changes significantly > > increase the install footprint of irssi (irssi 0.8.12 + deps is 1080KB > > larger than irssi 0.8.10 + deps.) I think it may be worth keeping the > > old version for those using flash constrained devices (we seem to have > > enough people wanting to irc from their wrt54g.) > > > > I can copy the existing irssi 0.8.10 package to irssi-old (or some other > > suitable name) and apply the 0.8.12 patch, but I wanted to get some user > > input on the subject (and what the name for the older package should be.) > > > > -Andy > > _______________________________________________ > > openwrt-devel mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
