On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 03:38:40 pm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> I personally find it difficult to keep track of which patches on the
> mailing list have been applied and which have not.
Absolutely, unless emailed patches  are going to a single person who 
delegates, this isn't a workable solution.
>
> Trac is much more usefull here. i certainly cannot remember why patch
> series started to pop up on the ML and not in trac.
>
> Trac is full of bugs, which we do want and need to apply. We owe this
> to the users and contributors of owrt.

We need to change something - both the openwrt developers and active 
contributors are a valuable resource, often with many other demands on their 
time.  There are so many positives about this project, and I personally would 
like to see it continue and thrive.  

> So here is my 10 point plan of how we could change this.
Yay for a plan.. I agree with all points.

>
> 1.) Create a proper user manual
Both for openwrt and buildroot-ng.
>
> 6.) less flaming please. as said before, we all work really hard and
> some times it just takes time. I for example do about 55+ hours a week
> before even looking at owrt.
I hope my response didn't sound like a flame. Possibly it did. Sorry if so.

I'm going to get back to resubmitting my patches after Andy's comments.  There 
needs to be exactly this kind of dialog between the dev's and the 
contributors.  Keep contributors on their toes.. but just keep the feedback 
coming :)

//.ichael G.
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
http://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Reply via email to