Hey Imre, Le Friday 23 May 2008 16:13:59 Imre Kaloz, vous avez écrit : > I share Gregers' view, too.. Also, one central git is a chaotic mess for > this, every target would need it's own branch.. Think ddwrt's repo :P
John and I had a short discussion about that on irc. Basically, the idea behind having git.openwrt.org is to have the following layout : - patches-upstream.git which contains the patches against generic (or quite) generic parts of the kernel - ar7.git, adm5120.git, ifxmips.git ... for every target that is either already merged mainline I do not think this would confuse people, because we do not need to mention such repositories to the "end user". This would definitively ease the work to maintain custom drivers and archictecture code and ask mainline maintainers to just pull those repository as a branch. Do you like it better explained that way ? -- Best regards, Florian Fainelli Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://openwrt.org -------------------------------
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org http://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
