On Sun, 3 Feb 2008, Imre Kaloz wrote:
> 2008.02.03. 16:34:20 dátumon Robert P. J. Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> írta:
>
> >
> > those two AVR-related patches were the only two i didn't upgrade and
> > submit for binutils-2.18 simply because, as you can see, that one
> > patch is *monstrously* large. where did it come from? is there
> > someone who's responsible for the AVR-related openwrt content? it
> > doesn't make much difference to me since i'm not planning on doing any
> > AVR-related work but that patch has all sorts of problems patching
> > against binutils-2.18, and i'd hate to be the person responsible for
> > fixing it. :-)
> >
> > rday
>
> Those are from Atmel. There are newer versions in
> http://www.atmel.no/buildroot/source/buildroot-avr32-v2.1.0.tar.bz2 but
> didn't have time to look into them, yet.
ah. well, i'll leave messing with that in someone else's capable
hands. :-)
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry
Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
Home page: http://crashcourse.ca
Fedora Cookbook: http://crashcourse.ca/wiki/index.php/Fedora_Cookbook
========================================================================
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
http://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
