I don't think everyone needs access. Provided a few people act as
editors for full submissions and corrections, it should be fine.
I think from here we should choose the editor(s) and then list what
should be documented. Then we can all make a request to write the
appropriate section of our choosing and if it's not taken by someone
else we all start writing.
Submissions are made for the sections and the final format of those
sections can be decided by the editor(s) or everyone.
-Nathan
On 18-Sep-07, at 5:51 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all
(sorry for the delay in responding - I've been partly hanging in the
"air" due to work and family life).
As it can be read from the below there are a couple of practical
points:
1. Would be good to keep the documentation in latex, due to its
present
integration in svn.
2. The present svn based model makes it easy to update the
documentation
in sync with the source.
3. If the present structure/model is to be continued it is needed to
decide who's going to have access to commit to svn (from amongst the
documentation-team members, or ...)?
4. And (just added comment from my side), the present html based
documentation could need a stylesheet (css)?
5. And (yet another added comment from my side), if the above is the
foundation how does the documentation-team best procede from here?
Chz
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
http://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
