Gregers Petersen wrote: > The Gentoo 'bug-day' runs across 24 hours - so I think there should be > amble time for people (independent of time zones) to participate. It is > a problem with missing certain things so the use of mailling-list could > be a good solution. > On the other hand, it might also result in a lack of focus on the > specific time/place? > A combination could be to have one or more members post running updates > during the 24 hours on the mail-list, while keeping the activities on irc? Sounds good to me.
> The advertizing aspect could be a combination of the mentioned - and > added to this, and I think this would be very important, is that someone > writes a short summary of what happened and that this is posted > forexample in the forum? Yeah, we could write it to the mailing list and copy it to the forum afterwards. >> I would like to suggest that something similar was introduced as part of >> the activities of OpenWrt? Though, I have to admit that I believe the >> concept itself would have to be changed somewhat. >> >> It can be difficult to identify what a "bug" is, when it comes to >> OpenWrt - is it in the software or the hardware, or a combination of >> both. Gentoo is mainly a distribution aimed at the more 'classic' >> pc/server architecture - whereas OpenWrt is an embedded system. It is my >> experience that you have to become quite confident with direct tinkering >> with hardware, to become a skilled user/developer - when it comes to >> OpenWrt (tell me if I'm wrong?) >> The category of hardware with WIP status (Work-In-Progress) is quite >> wellknown, but also mysterious. >> >> It is my suggestion to use the focus on the WIP status, as a way of >> organizing a parallel to the Gentoo Bug-Day. This would bring focus to >> the following: >> >> 1. OpenWrt is no longer "just" aimed at Linksys routers (or just >> routers >> in general). >> >> 2. A long list of platforms are of interest: >> https://dev.openwrt.org/wiki/platforms - and various developers are >> interested in these/work on them. >> >> 3. It is not difficult to take part in practical terms - and the OpenWrt >> project is open and public. >> >> By organizing a day (monthly, or more often) it would become possible to >> promote these platforms and present the individual >> developers/committers >> of them - hereby both create a way of making information accessible and >> help people participate in the development process. >> It would be needed that the various developers "handling" the platforms >> would be willing to spend a day (24 hours) guiding and helping - but >> this would hopefully not be a problem? It would anyway be on some sort >> of rotation. >> >> >> I would say monthly, I don't think the resources are there to do it more >> often. > Monthly is a good starting point. > > >> Practical example: A WIP-Day could look as the following: >> >> The focus is on the Fritz-Box - people who are interested in upgrading >> their Fritz-Box or porting OpenWrt compile a list of problem/bugs before >> 'WIP-Day' - then they gather on a defined IRC #Channel and start >> working >> on the list (with helping each other and new-commers). >> >> >> I don't think the day should be focused on a particular box as much as >> having developers online to cover a platform (AR7-2.6), it may be better >> to have enough developers online to cover most platforms and work on >> packages. The first WIP-Day could focus on Pre1 bugs, particularly >> packages that do not compile and the couple of remaining tickets in trac. >> > I agree - and I think my initial suggestion in regard to this was > somewhat unclear (as to how I understood hardware and platforms) --> I > was thinking that it should be based on platforms. I think it doesn't necessarily have to be based on platforms. That would be kind of limiting, since most of the interesting work that people can do to familiarize themselves with the system is platform independent, e.g. creating new packages, improving the network/config scripts, etc. >> This would hopefully result in a 'power-boost' to the work with the >> Fritz-Box, as well as support the community is a positive way. >> >> Some continuations of this idea --> >> >> 1. Hopefully members would begin helping out with the practical >> organizing or such a WIP-Day - as well as perhaps work on general >> documentation could be spawned (and a re-working of the existing). >> >> 2. It would be possible to extend WIP-Day into 'real world' - using >> various settings to organize practical OpenWrt workshops. People could >> attend and get introduced both to members/developers and learn new >> skills. >> One such workshop could focus on learning to interact with embedded >> hardware - from tftp, over serial, to jtag, basic soldering and so >> forth. If you'r not experienced with these things, it's difficult to >> learn it by yourself. >> Again, such 'real world' activities would also help make OpenWrt more >> accessible. >> These would be great for people to learn but need to be arranged by the >> community. Maybe there could be a easy way to advertise such meetings so >> that people that are interested would be able to attend. > I fully believe that it should be up to community members to organize > both WIP-Day and other activities - though it seems (at least to me) > that there is a need for someone to give it a little push. And I'm here > not saying that the present developers should do this (take the > initiative to "push"), just be part of this discussion and support what > ever the conclusion will be to the extend everyone is able to do so? I really like this idea, but I don't have the time to organize it, so I don't know how we can get this started. - Felix _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
