On Sun, Mar 14, 2021 at 22:05:38 -0600, Eric Schoeller wrote: > This gets a little sloppy with the need to have multiple > tunnels/networks on each machine, but it works and resolves the > problem of having 'Server A' become unavailable - B and C can still > communicate. > > Is there a better way to do this? Somehow having all three machines > participate in the same network?
For what it's worth, depending on how tied you are to using OpenVPN, you might find that tinc works better for this particular application. In particular, tinc can build a mesh network between all nodes in the network, rather than being limited to client-server relationships between pairs of nodes.... https://tinc-vpn.org/ Nathan ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Nathan Stratton Treadway - natha...@ontko.com - Mid-Atlantic region Ray Ontko & Co. - Software consulting services - http://www.ontko.com/ GPG Key: http://www.ontko.com/~nathanst/gpg_key.txt ID: 1023D/ECFB6239 Key fingerprint = 6AD8 485E 20B9 5C71 231C 0C32 15F3 ADCD ECFB 6239 _______________________________________________ Openvpn-users mailing list Openvpn-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-users
