Hello, Thanks for the information on routing. So it is working? How then when I did the ipconfig /all didn't it show up as default gateway on the openvpn adapter?
The issue when I tried to start the Interactive Services detection service was it kept giving me an error 1. Here's the fix for that: https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/home_is_where_i_lay_my_head/2012/10/09/windows-8-interactive-services-detection-error-1-incorrect-function/ Once Interactive Services detection service was going I restarted Openvpn gui (it is v2.4 and I never had 2.3 on this box), I did not get the Uac dialog box and the connection was successful. My current route print looks like this: =========================================================================== Interface List 15...90 2b 34 98 ed d7 ......Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller 9...84 1b 5e 97 85 4e ......Microsoft Hosted Network Virtual Adapter #2 22...84 1b 5e 97 85 4e ......Microsoft Wi-Fi Direct Virtual Adapter #2 2...00 50 56 c0 00 01 ......VMware Virtual Ethernet Adapter for VMnet1 6...00 50 56 c0 00 08 ......VMware Virtual Ethernet Adapter for VMnet8 11...00 ff 5d 7e 85 66 ......TAP-Windows Adapter V9 24...84 1b 5e 97 85 4e ......NETGEAR WNA1000M N150 Wireless USB Micro Adapter #2 1...........................Software Loopback Interface 1 26...00 00 00 00 00 00 00 e0 Microsoft ISATAP Adapter 3...00 00 00 00 00 00 00 e0 Microsoft Teredo Tunneling Adapter 25...00 00 00 00 00 00 00 e0 Microsoft ISATAP Adapter #2 10...00 00 00 00 00 00 00 e0 Microsoft ISATAP Adapter #3 17...00 00 00 00 00 00 00 e0 Microsoft ISATAP Adapter #4 =========================================================================== IPv4 Route Table =========================================================================== Active Routes: Network Destination Netmask Gateway Interface Metric 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.2.1 192.168.2.97 55 0.0.0.0 128.0.0.0 192.168.0.1 192.168.0.2 291 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx 255.255.255.255 192.168.2.1 192.168.2.97 311 127.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 On-link 127.0.0.1 331 127.0.0.1 255.255.255.255 On-link 127.0.0.1 331 127.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 127.0.0.1 331 128.0.0.0 128.0.0.0 192.168.0.1 192.168.0.2 291 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 On-link 192.168.0.2 291 192.168.0.2 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.0.2 291 192.168.0.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.0.2 291 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0 On-link 192.168.2.97 311 192.168.2.97 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.2.97 311 192.168.2.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.2.97 311 192.168.153.0 255.255.255.0 On-link 192.168.153.1 291 192.168.153.1 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.153.1 291 192.168.153.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.153.1 291 192.168.237.0 255.255.255.0 On-link 192.168.237.1 291 192.168.237.1 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.237.1 291 192.168.237.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.237.1 291 224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 On-link 127.0.0.1 331 224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 On-link 192.168.237.1 291 224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 On-link 192.168.153.1 291 224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 On-link 192.168.0.2 291 224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 On-link 192.168.2.97 311 255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 127.0.0.1 331 255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.237.1 291 255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.153.1 291 255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.0.2 291 255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.2.97 311 =========================================================================== Persistent Routes: None IPv6 Route Table =========================================================================== Active Routes: If Metric Network Destination Gateway 1 331 ::1/128 On-link 24 311 fe80::/64 On-link 24 311 fe80::7425:96fc:f2eb:1dcb/128 On-link 1 331 ff00::/8 On-link 24 311 ff00::/8 On-link =========================================================================== Persistent Routes: None Is this setup now fully working? If so, can I tighten it up in any way? Thanks. Dave. On 4/24/17, Gert Doering <g...@greenie.muc.de> wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 02:08:55PM -0400, David Mehler wrote: >> Below is a copy of route print. > >> IPv4 Route Table >> =========================================================================== >> Active Routes: >> Network Destination Netmask Gateway Interface >> Metric >> 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.2.1 192.168.2.97 >> 55 >> 0.0.0.0 128.0.0.0 192.168.0.1 192.168.0.2 >> 36 >> 128.0.0.0 128.0.0.0 192.168.0.1 192.168.0.2 >> 36 > > Things are working perfectly fine (and this is what I expected to see). > > With "def1", you get two half-default-routes (0.0.0.0/128.0.0.0 and > 128.0.0.0/128.0.0.0), which can be put into the table without having to > muck around with the 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0 entry. > > Due to the nature of routing, the most specific match for a destination > address will "win", as in "route the packet" - so a /24 will match > first, then a /8, then a /0 (for example) - "/0" being "the default route, > which matches everything". > > With two /1 routes installed that cover the full IPv4 space, these serve > as "the least specific route that the packet will encounter", since > *together*, they match all destinations (/1+/1 = /0). > > > As for the UAC dialog popping up: this looks like you had 2.3 installed > previously, which needed the [x] "run as admin" setting to give you > the needed privs - depending on how this was configured, it is *so* > sticky that even removing older openvpn completely and then installing > 2.4 might not get rid of it. With 2.4, you should never see an UAC > dialogue when starting the GUI. > > gert > -- > USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW! > > //www.muc.de/~gert/ > Gert Doering - Munich, Germany > g...@greenie.muc.de > fax: +49-89-35655025 > g...@net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Openvpn-users mailing list Openvpn-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-users
