Ancient it may be, but it's still what's shipping with current stable
Debian. But, maybe I should go ahead and bite the bullet and upgrade
anyway. (Though I seem to recall a mention that 2.4 is more picky about
having fresh crl's than 2.3 was, and I know I'll need to be cautious about
that...)
Thanks!
-Joe
On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 12:50 PM Selva Nair <selva.n...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 12:45 PM, Joe Patterson <j.m.patter...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Aha! I'm running 2.3.4. That's very useful information to know!
>
>
> 2.3.4 is ancient... upgrade to 2.4 :)
>
> Selva
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 12:21 PM Selva Nair <selva.n...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 12:01 PM, Joe Patterson <j.m.patter...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Status 2 looks like it gives me 3 tables, none with a CID. I do get both
> the client CN, username, and virtual address together, which is handy, but
> no CID:
>
> HEADER,CLIENT_LIST,Common Name,Real Address,Virtual Address,Bytes
> Received,Bytes Sent,Connected Since,Connected Since (time_t),Username
>
> HEADER,ROUTING_TABLE,Virtual Address,Common Name,Real Address,Last
> Ref,Last Ref (time_t)
>
> GLOBAL_STATS,Max bcast/mcast queue length,0
>
>
> Which version? Here is what my 2.4 server shows:
> HEADER,CLIENT_LIST,Common Name,Real Address,Virtual Address,Virtual IPv6
> Address,Bytes Received,Bytes Sent,Connected Since,Connected Since
> (time_t),Username,Client ID,Peer ID
> CLIENT_LIST,home-router,174.116.201.36:57808,10.9.0.2,2600:xx:xx::1000,8015805,4356712,Fri
> Feb 24 20:45:17 2017,1487987117,xxxx,13959,2
>
> CID is the second last.
>
> Selva
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Openvpn-users mailing list
Openvpn-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-users
