Hi,

On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 09:49:55AM +0100, Axel Glienke wrote:
> Sorry, i dont understood:
> why the 2 ips (gmx.de; spiegel.de) a different routing? both are  
> public ips with same scheme? why there a differnt handle by my routing  
> table?

One is matched by 0.0.0.0/1 (because it's starting with an IP between
0. and 127.) and the other not (because it's starting with an IP between
128. and 255.)

> >> 0.0.0.0/1 via 10.8.0.5 dev tun0

This will catch *half* of the internet destinations.

> >> traceroute gmx.de
> >> traceroute to gmx.de (213.165.65.60), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets

Second half.

> >> traceroute to spiegel.de (62.138.116.3), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets

First half.

gert
-- 
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             g...@greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        g...@net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Go from Idea to Many App Stores Faster with Intel(R) XDK
Give your users amazing mobile app experiences with Intel(R) XDK.
Use one codebase in this all-in-one HTML5 development environment.
Design, debug & build mobile apps & 2D/3D high-impact games for multiple OSs.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=254741911&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
Openvpn-users mailing list
Openvpn-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-users

Reply via email to