Hi, On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 09:49:55AM +0100, Axel Glienke wrote: > Sorry, i dont understood: > why the 2 ips (gmx.de; spiegel.de) a different routing? both are > public ips with same scheme? why there a differnt handle by my routing > table?
One is matched by 0.0.0.0/1 (because it's starting with an IP between 0. and 127.) and the other not (because it's starting with an IP between 128. and 255.) > >> 0.0.0.0/1 via 10.8.0.5 dev tun0 This will catch *half* of the internet destinations. > >> traceroute gmx.de > >> traceroute to gmx.de (213.165.65.60), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets Second half. > >> traceroute to spiegel.de (62.138.116.3), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets First half. gert -- USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW! //www.muc.de/~gert/ Gert Doering - Munich, Germany g...@greenie.muc.de fax: +49-89-35655025 g...@net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Go from Idea to Many App Stores Faster with Intel(R) XDK Give your users amazing mobile app experiences with Intel(R) XDK. Use one codebase in this all-in-one HTML5 development environment. Design, debug & build mobile apps & 2D/3D high-impact games for multiple OSs. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=254741911&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________ Openvpn-users mailing list Openvpn-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-users