That agrees with my understanding.  What I didn't know is if a single 
192.168.0.0/16 could replace the two 192.168.0.0/24 and 192.168.5.0/24 
routes.

Either way - I'm still not getting the communication I want.  Any more 
ideas/suggestions?

---
Daniel

On 2015-08-19 10:21, Rui Santos wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
> 
> On 19-08-2015 17:59, dmil...@amfes.com wrote:
>> Is there a difference between doing 192.168.0.0/16, vs having two 
>> routes
>> of 192.168.0.0/24 and 192.168.5.0/24?
> In your example, the /16 route will never be used when communicating to
> any of those /24 networks.
> 
> Routing algorithms specify that when multiple routes to the same
> destination exists, the route that will be used is the more specific 
> one.
> So, a /24 will be used instead of an existing /23 or /16 in your case.
> This is why the default gateway is the "last resort" gateway it a /0
> network, which means all destinations.
> 
> Hope it helped on your routing understating.
> 
> Regards,
> Rui
> 
>> 
>> My thinking, flawed as it is, is:
>> 1.  Both hosts have known routing tables that allow them to 
>> communicate.
>> 2.  At each host, define an additional route that utilizes the 
>> existing
>> routes.
>> 
>> something like - (since this is Windows):
>>     route add 192.168.5.6 10.59.97.8 (on VirtualBox) - and then -
>>     route add 192.168.5.119 192.168.5.6
>> 
>>     I don't see a reason to add any routes to the Windows client - 
>> it's
>> already talking.
>> 
>> But since I've tried this and it doesn't work - obviously I'm missing
>> something.
>> 
>> ---
>> Daniel
>> 
>> On 2015-08-19 02:24, Doug Lytle wrote:
>>> Erich Titl wrote:
>>>>> I already have 192.168.0.0/24 routes on the Windows client
>>>> This route does not cover 192.168.5.x
>>> To expand on that just a little bit.
>>> 
>>> 192.168.0.0/24 only covers 192.168.0.1-254, you'd want /16
>>> 
>>> Doug
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Openvpn-users mailing list
>>> Openvpn-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-users
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> _______________________________________________
>> Openvpn-users mailing list
>> Openvpn-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-users
>> 
>> 
> 
> --
> Melhores Cumprimentos / Best Regards,
> 
> *Rui Santos* <mailto:rsan...@ruisantos.com>
> Systems Administrator
> <https://www.facebook.com/GRUP0PIE>
> <http://www.linkedin.com/company/grupopie-portugal>
> <https://twitter.com/GrupoPIE> <http://www.youtube.com/user/PIEGrupo>
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Openvpn-users mailing list
> Openvpn-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-users

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Openvpn-users mailing list
Openvpn-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-users

Reply via email to