-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 05/05/14 05:05, david wrote:
> 
>> -----Original Message----- From: Gert Doering
>> [mailto:g...@greenie.muc.de] Sent: Monday, 5 May 2014 5:51 AM To:
>> Jonathan Tripathy Cc: openvpn-users@lists.sourceforge.net 
>> Subject: Re: [Openvpn-users] doubts about possible sniffing
>> 
>> Of course not.  The session key is negotiated between client and
>> the server as part of the TLS handshake, and is unique for each
>> client.
> 
> Sure, but there is nothing "of course" about it. The server key 
> might be pinned, and the client might be using a static key for its
> "unique" value.

You cannot have multiple clients connected at the same time with
static keys.  To use static keys, OpenVPN must be configured as
peer-to-peer, and not peer-to-multi-peer (--client/--server).


- -- 
kind regards,

David Sommerseth
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlNn0YcACgkQDC186MBRfroCRACeMTuT5RrUUZkmWKlL9/ggtUwi
HZkAoIf5yV7OlVshaSSW+Jd+bOBdKr4S
=q3yc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Is your legacy SCM system holding you back? Join Perforce May 7 to find out:
• 3 signs your SCM is hindering your productivity
• Requirements for releasing software faster
• Expert tips and advice for migrating your SCM now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/perforce
_______________________________________________
Openvpn-users mailing list
Openvpn-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-users

Reply via email to