Hi,

Sarah Belghiti wrote:
> Hi,
> Thanks for your help.
> I do need multiple CAs and multiple CRLs.
> Using the --capath option means replace "ca ca.crt" by "capath 
> /path/to/a/directory" in the server conf file ??
yes you'd use
  capath /full/path/to/dir

and in that directory you'll need to create hashed versions of the 
certificate and CRL's used; the .crt files should be renamed to <hash>.0 
and the .crl files to <has>.r0
where <hash> is the output of
  openssl x509 -hash -noout -in ca.crt

HTH,

JJK

>
>
> 2013/7/1 Jan Just Keijser <janj...@nikhef.nl <mailto:janj...@nikhef.nl>>
>
>     Hi Sarah,
>
>
>     Sarah Belghiti wrote:
>
>         Hi,
>
>         I'm trying to test OpenVPN with several CRLs.
>         There are two Intermediate CA and a root CA.
>         The two intermediates CA have revoked two certificates.
>         So I have two CRLs.
>         I've tried stacking the two CRLs in one (cat CRL-1.list
>         CRL-2.list > CRL.pem ) and add the --crl-verify crl.pem but it
>         does not work and only one of the two revoked certifcates is
>         unable to connect to the VPN.
>
>         Then I saw this message :
>         
> http://readlist.com/lists/lists.sourceforge.net/openvpn-users/3/17643.html
>         wich seems to be the solution of my problem.
>
>         Before testing it I wonder if adding --crl-verify is necessary ?
>
>     stacking CRLs currently does not work with OpenVPN. A minor code
>     change would be needed for the Openssl backend.
>     you would need CRLs only if you are actively revoking user
>     certificates - otherwise not.
>     If you really need mulitple CAs and multiple CRLs then use the
>     --capath option.
>



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:

Build for Windows Store.

http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Openvpn-users mailing list
Openvpn-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-users

Reply via email to