Hi, On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 09:51:45PM +0200, Steffan Karger wrote: > TL;DR: I don't think this should be merged yet. > [..] > So if we want to improve things for AES-GCM, we probably need other > optimizations. I have some ideas, but was hoping to do some research and a > write-up during the train ride to the hackathon, so we could discuss it > further in Karlsruhe.
Thanks for having a look. This ruins my planned work for today :-) - but
since we are not in a great hurry *and* Karlsruhe is just next week, it
will not harm to delay for a few weeks if the end result gets better.
Just for the record - I've done all the testing on v11 yesterday, and
it behaves very well interoping with "older peers" (no DATA_V3) and
also "falling back to DATA_V2 if DCO is active" (as there is no code
yet to do V3 with DCO). master-to-master negotiates DATA_V3 and still
pings :-) - so, the code we have is good to be merged, if we decide to
keep it that way. If not, I know what I need to test and how.
gert
--
"If was one thing all people took for granted, was conviction that if you
feed honest figures into a computer, honest figures come out. Never doubted
it myself till I met a computer with a sense of humor."
Robert A. Heinlein, The Moon is a Harsh Mistress
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany g...@greenie.muc.de
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Openvpn-devel mailing list Openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-devel
