On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 7:30 PM Antonio Quartulli <a...@unstable.cc> wrote:
> Hi, > > for the netlink/sitnl bits: this makes sense to me. > I agree with Selva that the v6 variant could benefit from the same > treatment. > > However, this patch can also be hacked on its own > > Acked-by: Antonio Quartulli <a...@unstable.cc> > Not so fast. As it stands the patch introduces a bug that was not there: existing v6 routes can cause CONENCTED,ROUTE_ERROR instead of CONNECTED,SUCCESS. That's why I did not ACK it. Not sure I understand "can also be hacked alone". Selva
_______________________________________________ Openvpn-devel mailing list Openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-devel