Hi, On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 04:45:04PM +0100, Antonio Quartulli wrote: > README.IPv6 is quite useless because IPv6 is not a second > class citizen anymore. Most of the content is "obvious" or explained in > the manpage along with other details/options. > > TODO.IPv6 is old and many implemented things are still reported there > for no clear reason. Prune all useless details and keep what seems to > still be not implemented. > > Cc: Gert Doering <g...@greenie.muc.de> > Signed-off-by: Antonio Quartulli <a...@unstable.cc> > --- > > I am personally in favour of killing TODO.IPv6 as well and rather > document missing features in trac tickets. Thoughts?
Out it goes!
> +4.) safety check: if connecting over IPv6 (v6 transport) and the pushed
> route-ipv6 network encompasses the server IPv6 address, make sure
> we at least log a warning (until we can fiddle with external routing
> to make this work correctly).
We fiddle with external routing to make it work :-) - since 2.4, I think.
> o implement comparison for mapped addresses: server in dual stack
> listening IPv6 must permit incoming streams from allowed IPv4 peer,
> currently you need to pass eg: --remote ffff::1.2.3.4
That seems to be obsolete as well, with the full DS rewrite Arne did for 2.4.
gert
--
"If was one thing all people took for granted, was conviction that if you
feed honest figures into a computer, honest figures come out. Never doubted
it myself till I met a computer with a sense of humor."
Robert A. Heinlein, The Moon is a Harsh Mistress
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany g...@greenie.muc.de
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Openvpn-devel mailing list Openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-devel
