Hi, On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 11:52:59AM +0200, Simon Matter wrote: > > It sounds like there is no answer to this? > > Then why are we even discussing further? > > It could be at least one feature to prevent people from moving over to > WireGuard?
Unless people can come up with real use cases why compression makes
sense for them, and just move over to wireguard "BECAUSE IT HAS NO
COMPRESSION EITHER, BUT YOU TOOK IT AWAY FROM ME!! STAMP FOOT!" this
is hardly a compelling argument.
Wireguard is a good protocol, and if what it can do for you is *enough*,
it might be a better solution.
OpenVPN solves a vastly larger problem space, so any comparision to
wireguard based on features that wireguard doesn't have is a bit weird.
gert
--
"If was one thing all people took for granted, was conviction that if you
feed honest figures into a computer, honest figures come out. Never doubted
it myself till I met a computer with a sense of humor."
Robert A. Heinlein, The Moon is a Harsh Mistress
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany g...@greenie.muc.de
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Openvpn-devel mailing list Openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-devel
