Hi, On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 05:52:12PM +0500, ???????? ?????????????? wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 04:54:13PM +0500, ???????? ?????????????? wrote: > > > if nobody minds, I can send several patches that eliminates comparison of > > > OPENSSL_VERSION, for example > > > > We do mind. They are coded this way on purpose - so when we drop support > > for OpenSSL before 1.1.0, it is clear from the code which sections can > > it is not much fun to catch things like > https://boringssl.googlesource.com/boringssl/+/49e9f67d8b7cbeb3953b5548ad1009d15947a523%5E%21/include/openssl/base.h > > (BoringSSL claims itself as 1.1.0, accidentally decided "I'm 1.1.1 now")
We do not support BoringSSL.
(Or any other SSL library that claims "I am compatible with OpenSSL 1.1.1"
but isn't, really - which is why the LibreSSL adjustments are always very
minimal)
We sort-of-support LibreSSL because it is the system SSL library on
OpenBSD. Otherwise, the answer would be the same as for BoringSSL.
gert
--
"If was one thing all people took for granted, was conviction that if you
feed honest figures into a computer, honest figures come out. Never doubted
it myself till I met a computer with a sense of humor."
Robert A. Heinlein, The Moon is a Harsh Mistress
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany g...@greenie.muc.de
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Openvpn-devel mailing list Openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-devel
