Hi, On Sun, Nov 03, 2019 at 01:31:48PM +0800, Tom Yan wrote: > src/openvpn/tun.c | 7 ++++--- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
I tend to NAK this, on a number of reasons - we support arbitrary
point-to-point links "since ever" if you do "topology p2p" (can be
out of the same /31, or just arbitrary addresses on both ends), so
I do not see why doing this in "topology subnet" would be beneficial.
OTOH, *if* you do it, it needs to be consistently, not just "linux/iproute"
(on linux, "sitnl" is the new gold standard), and the commit message should
explain a bit more about the "why do it this way" and "how do other
platforms deal with it" (windows, *BSD, MacOS, etc.)
gert
--
"If was one thing all people took for granted, was conviction that if you
feed honest figures into a computer, honest figures come out. Never doubted
it myself till I met a computer with a sense of humor."
Robert A. Heinlein, The Moon is a Harsh Mistress
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany g...@greenie.muc.de
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Openvpn-devel mailing list Openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-devel
