Hi, On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 02:12:29AM +0800, Antonio Quartulli wrote: > > That should be enough, but we could get fancy and use -1L and compare > > the result against sprintf(str, "%lu", -1L) > > I just recommended something similar on IRC. > I think it would make sense to "validate" argv_printf* against sprintf. > Not just for %lu but also for the other formats. This way we know our > code is doing what sprintf would also do.
I'll go for the "just 1" thing so we have something.
If one of you feels bored, I'm happy to test something more fancy :-) -
but I do not feel particularily like "coming up with fancy tests for
argv.c" today.
gert
--
"If was one thing all people took for granted, was conviction that if you
feed honest figures into a computer, honest figures come out. Never doubted
it myself till I met a computer with a sense of humor."
Robert A. Heinlein, The Moon is a Harsh Mistress
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany g...@greenie.muc.de
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________ Openvpn-devel mailing list Openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-devel
