Hi, On 20-01-18 17:52, Gert Doering wrote: > On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 09:05:50AM -0500, Selva Nair wrote: >> If/when the TLS1.2+ support for cryptoapicert is ready for merge, is >> it a candidate for 2.4? Technically its a new feature but considering >> the "popular belief" that TLS1.1 needs to be shunned, and 2.5 is still >> far away, its worth considering.. >> >> In that case this patch would need to be backported to 2.4, so good to >> know what's the general consensus. > > I would argue that TLS 1.2 is officially supported by 2.4, and as such > it's a bug if cryptoapicert doesn't :-) > > Given that the changes are fairly well localized and will not affect > other platforms, and are likely to not affect users that do not use > cryptoapicert, I would tend to "make sure that all we offer works with > TLS 1.2" -> include in 2.4
Completely agree. I would like to see this backported to 2.4. -Steffan
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________ Openvpn-devel mailing list Openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-devel
