Hi, On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 02:31:40AM +0200, David Sommerseth wrote: > If we really do care for supporting 0.9.8, in release/2.4 - I can give > this an ACK. Otherwise, I think it might be better to backport > 039a89c331e9b7998d804 + 79ea67f77ca3afe91222f.
You are the one that objects most violently if we break users' expectations
- and I think "changing library *requirements* right in the middle of a
release train" is a good way to do that... even if all *supported by the
maintainers* OS version have recent-enough OpenSSL libraries, I expect people
to happily use 2.4.2 on "something", and if 2.4.3 stops compiling there,
this is not a good thing to do.
So I'd just fix the library order (= go with Steffan's patch) and not
backport the larger changes.
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany g...@greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025 g...@net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________ Openvpn-devel mailing list Openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-devel
