The length check in tls_ctx_restrict_ciphers() did not check for overflow, which could lead to a stack buffer overflow.
This has no real-world impact, because --tls-cipher can only be specified by entities that are allowed to supply config settings. Since those entities can also change --script-security and call scripts and/or plugins, these users already have code execution at the level of the openvpn process. In other words: the attacker would not gain any capabilities. Nevertheless, a nasty bug that we should fix. This bug was discovered and reported to the OpenVPN security team by Guido Vranken. Signed-off-by: Steffan Karger <steffan.kar...@fox-it.com> --- src/openvpn/ssl_openssl.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/openvpn/ssl_openssl.c b/src/openvpn/ssl_openssl.c index 645ccf5..73c07e3 100644 --- a/src/openvpn/ssl_openssl.c +++ b/src/openvpn/ssl_openssl.c @@ -352,7 +352,8 @@ tls_ctx_restrict_ciphers(struct tls_root_ctx *ctx, const char *ciphers) } /* Make sure new cipher name fits in cipher string */ - if (((sizeof(openssl_ciphers)-1) - openssl_ciphers_len) < current_cipher_len) + if ((SIZE_MAX - openssl_ciphers_len) < current_cipher_len + || ((sizeof(openssl_ciphers)-1) < openssl_ciphers_len + current_cipher_len)) { msg(M_FATAL, "Failed to set restricted TLS cipher list, too long (>%d).", -- 2.7.4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Openvpn-devel mailing list Openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-devel