On 06/04/17 14:49, debbie10t wrote: > > As you can see, the current proposal does not allow for first random, > followed by expected/normal/regular renegs. It is either *always* random > or *never* random .. I believe this is a poor decision.
Even though I see arguments for first-only, I have no issues having the current implementation being "always" or "none". Adding a flag so the user can switch it to "first-only" will be a fairly trivial patch to add. In fact, I already now believe 66% of that possible future patch will be updating the man page and Changes.rst. The code itself to manage this will be probably around 10-15 lines of code - possibly even less - when basing it on the "always" behaviour. And if not a critical mass of users complains within a reasonable time ... well, then we don't need to bother. No need to make even more noise about that now. -- kind regards, David Sommerseth OpenVPN Technologies, Inc
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________ Openvpn-devel mailing list Openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-devel
