Hello, On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 1:03 PM, Steffan Karger <stef...@karger.me> wrote: > > Hi Emmanuel, > > Thank you very much. You approach looks good to me, and quite closely > matches what I had in mind for when I would find the time to tackle > this. (Which might have taken me a while, so really happy to see these > patches!) >
Thanks Steffan, > As discussed in other threads, we do want to support building on RHEL6, > which is why we would prefer to be compatible with (patched) OpenSSL > 0.9.8. I haven't tested anything yet, but looking at the patches this > might very well just work, or otherwise just needs some minor tweaking. I haven't tested compilation with 0.9.8 but unless some massive changes in the interface occured, this should not be a problem. I'd do that at the beginning of next week. > Also very good that this is split up into small and independently > reviewable patches. I'll start review soon. > > -Steffan For the record, most of the patches deal with changing how the code access to one selected OpenSSL type. I hope it will ease review -- in the sense that people who are accustomed to the code might be able to see if something is missing. BR, -- Emmanuel Deloget ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Openvpn-devel mailing list Openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-devel
