Hi, On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 02:42:18PM +0100, Thomas Schäfer wrote: > > In case "def1" is not enough, please try "redirect-gateway def1 local", > > which is a hack (but a documented one). "local" signals "do not install > > a host route pointing to the default gateway, because the VPN server is > > in the same locally connected network" (think "university wifi"). So that > > should make things succeed. > This did not work. Same error as before.
This is a bit annoying. It does not need the default gateway when it's
not going to use it. *Flag as bug*.
> > If that is still not working, use brute force, and replace
> > "redirect-gateway"
> > with
> >
> > route 0.0.0.0/1
> > route 128.0.0.0/1
>
> This leads to:
>
> Thu Jan 19 14:10:43 2017 RESOLVE: Cannot resolve host address:
> 128.0.0.0/1: (Name or service not known)
Uh. Sorry. Forgot that this is still netmask-land.
> But
>
> route 0.0.0.0 128.0.0.0
> route 128.0.0.0 128.0.0.0
>
> works.
This is how the syntax should be. Thanks for testing, happy to finally
reach a working solution :-) - and I'll put "rework that v4 stuff" on my
limitless TODO list...
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany g...@greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025 g...@net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________ Openvpn-devel mailing list Openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-devel
