Hi, On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 04:09:16AM +0200, Jan Just Keijser wrote: > > Anyone having a good argument against it? JJK, do you happen to know > > what this is about? > > this is from even before my time ;)
Fun :-)
> I didn't even know that you could specify cipher without an argument -
> let's disable this (and I assume the same is true for --auth ?)
Indeed, the same is true, and it would lead to the same crash
(--auth none --auth)
else if (streq (p[0], "auth") && p[1] && !p[2])
{
VERIFY_PERMISSION (OPT_P_GENERAL);
options->authname_defined = true;
options->authname = p[1];
if (streq (options->authname, "none"))
{
options->authname_defined = false;
options->authname = NULL;
}
}
else if (streq (p[0], "auth") && !p[1])
{
VERIFY_PERMISSION (OPT_P_GENERAL);
options->authname_defined = true;
}
I think Steffan's patch (that he sent in parallel to my mail) takes care
of this as well...
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany g...@greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025 g...@net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
