On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 3:00 PM, Gert Doering <g...@greenie.muc.de> wrote:
> There's quite a bit of our code that fails compilation with
> "gcc -pedantic -ansi" and should not be changed - like, LZ4 using
> "long long" variables which C90 does not have.  Be pragmatic.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gert Doering <g...@greenie.muc.de>
> ---
>  configure.ac | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
> index d733023..4f14ebd 100644
> --- a/configure.ac
> +++ b/configure.ac
> @@ -1128,7 +1128,7 @@ fi
>  if test "${enable_pedantic}" = "yes"; then
>         enable_strict="yes"
>         CFLAGS="${CFLAGS} -pedantic"
> -       test "${WIN32}" != "yes" && CFLAGS="${CFLAGS} -ansi"
> +       test "${WIN32}" != "yes" && CFLAGS="${CFLAGS} -std=c99"
>  fi
>  if test "${enable_strict}" = "yes"; then
>         CFLAGS="${CFLAGS} -Wall -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-unused-function"
> --
> 2.7.3

Yes please!  ACK.

-Steffan

Reply via email to