Hi,

On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 10:44 AM, Samuli Seppänen <sam...@openvpn.net> wrote:
> Yes. I think a separate testing branch with more liberal commit rights
> combined with pulling from GitHub makes sense. I'm not sure what happens
> at the buildslaves if we decide rewind history - rewinding would be
> quite useful when working with pure testing branches in that we could
> make "testing" track master and whenever a bad patch is found, simply
> rewind back to the last known-good state.

Isn't this what github pull requests + travis is supposed to give us?
Of course, that currently only covers a rather small part (much less
than the buildbot tests), but it's not that hard to expand that to at
least a decent number of compile variations.  That would give us
useful smoke tests before looking at a single line of code.

(May I remind the list of
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.network.openvpn.devel/10865, which got
some comments from ciphitsine (see
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.network.openvpn.devel/11557/focus=11585),
but was never really ACK'ed and applied.)

-Steffan

Reply via email to