Hi, On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 10:44 AM, Samuli Seppänen <sam...@openvpn.net> wrote: > Yes. I think a separate testing branch with more liberal commit rights > combined with pulling from GitHub makes sense. I'm not sure what happens > at the buildslaves if we decide rewind history - rewinding would be > quite useful when working with pure testing branches in that we could > make "testing" track master and whenever a bad patch is found, simply > rewind back to the last known-good state.
Isn't this what github pull requests + travis is supposed to give us? Of course, that currently only covers a rather small part (much less than the buildbot tests), but it's not that hard to expand that to at least a decent number of compile variations. That would give us useful smoke tests before looking at a single line of code. (May I remind the list of http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.network.openvpn.devel/10865, which got some comments from ciphitsine (see http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.network.openvpn.devel/11557/focus=11585), but was never really ACK'ed and applied.) -Steffan