Hi, On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 05:13:01PM +0100, Jan Just Keijser wrote: > and a few others. However, the actual name of these env vars is local_N, > local_port_N etc. I've checked the code and that has been the case > since v2.1 > > Two questions: > - why are we adding the number? per connection there will be only one > local IP and only one local port
If it was there at v2.1 - "you tell us, you're the only one that has been
around back then" :-)
(Most likely it's just using the same function for "stick a number to it
and build an environment string containing an IP address" that is used
for route_1, route_2, ...)
> - should we update the man page to reflect this?
Actually, I'd go for "update the manpage, and keep the number" - Heiko
is working on multi-listen, so we could end up with multiple local
IPs and ports one day, and then it makes sense to have them numbered
local_1, local_2, etc.
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany g...@greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025 g...@net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
