Hi, On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 04:48:06PM +0200, Christos Trochalakis wrote: > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 03:37:04PM +0100, Gert Doering wrote: > >On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 04:06:50PM +0200, Christos Trochalakis wrote: > >> o --server-ipv6 is incompatible with the 'nopool' option > >> o ifconfig-ipv6-pool starts at 0x1000 and not 0x10000 since v2.3 > >> c55e9562: Implement IPv6 interface config with non-/64 prefix lengths > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Christos Trochalakis <yati...@ideopolis.gr> > > > >Uh, yes, in principle, but... > > > >> * push "tun-ipv6" > >> * ifconfig-ipv6 2001:db8::1 2001:db8::2 > >> - * if !nopool: > >> - * ifconfig-ipv6-pool 2001:db8::1:0/64 > >> + * ifconfig-ipv6-pool 2001:db8::1000/64 > > > >... the "if !nopool" should still be there, no? > > > > If I understand correctly 'nopool' option is only valid for --server and not > --server-ipv6.
What brings you to that assumption? (Background: if there is no IPv4 pool,
the IPv6 pool will not work, given the way the IPv6 pool is implemented)
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany g...@greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025 g...@net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
