Hi, On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 10:40:01AM +0200, Samuli Seppänen wrote: > > I also think it should be done with some "openvpn-ping" instead of icmp > > ping because it confirms the server is available on the protocol/port > > combination, whereas icmp doesn't > In what kind of scenario would an OpenVPN server not be available, if > the server itself still responds to pings?
"The server process crashed".
Not that OpenVPN would ever ASSERT() on invalid packets, or crash upon
bugs, no. :-)
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany g...@greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025 g...@net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
pgpY9q0S6UvSM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
