Hi, On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 11:13:24AM +0300, Samuli Seppänen wrote: > Currently all of the binary builds we provide[*] are linked to OpenSSL. > Would having both OpenSSL and PolarSSL builds make sense (e.g. starting > with 2.4)?
I think it would be a nice option. We could even start with 2.3.4 with
that, at least for windows... (if PolarSSL can be cross-compiled for
windows...)
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany g...@greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025 g...@net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
pgpF6uHLUyHiJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
