Am 21.01.2013 14:23, schrieb Gert Doering: > Hi, > > just for the sake of those not following the discussion on IRC... > > On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 11:23:17AM +0100, Gert Doering wrote: >> I'm more concernced about maintainability of the OpenVPN code base, and >> having more #ifdef in there is not the way forward. > > ... we have now come to some sort of conclusion on this: > > - 2.3.x will support PolarSSL 1.1 and 1.2, to help people building OpenVPN > with PolarSSL on distributions that ship 1.1 > > - 2.4.x will drop support for PolarSSL 1.1, to simplify the code
Thank you. This is a very reasonable approach - and exactly what I was proposing, perhaps not spelt out clearly enough. BTW I wouldn't bother too much about distributions shipping outdated stuff either; if people run Debian with outdated PolarSSL, they are bound to also use whatever OpenVPN version Debian has packaged.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
