ACK, the revision letter is indeed optional.

David,
Repository is at github...

On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 6:54 PM, Simon Deziel <simon.dez...@gmail.com> wrote:
> whichopensslcnf failed to return the right cnf for:
>
> $ openssl version
> OpenSSL 1.0.1 14 Mar 2012
>
> Signed-off-by: Simon Deziel <simon.dez...@gmail.com>
> ---
>  easy-rsa/2.0/whichopensslcnf |    6 +++---
>  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/easy-rsa/2.0/whichopensslcnf b/easy-rsa/2.0/whichopensslcnf
> index 2226a8e..ccdaf50 100755
> --- a/easy-rsa/2.0/whichopensslcnf
> +++ b/easy-rsa/2.0/whichopensslcnf
> @@ -3,11 +3,11 @@
>  cnf="$1/openssl.cnf"
>
>  if [ "$OPENSSL" ]; then
> -       if $OPENSSL version | grep -E "0\.9\.6[[:alnum:]]" > /dev/null; then
> +       if $OPENSSL version | grep -E "0\.9\.6[[:alnum:]]?" > /dev/null;
> then
>                cnf="$1/openssl-0.9.6.cnf"
> -       elif $OPENSSL version | grep -E "0\.9\.8[[:alnum:]]" >
> /dev/null; then
> +       elif $OPENSSL version | grep -E "0\.9\.8[[:alnum:]]?" >
> /dev/null; then
>                cnf="$1/openssl-0.9.8.cnf"
> -       elif $OPENSSL version | grep -E "1\.0\.([[:digit:]][[:alnum:]])"
>> /dev/null; then
> +       elif $OPENSSL version | grep -E "1\.0\.[[:digit:]][[:alnum:]]?"
>> /dev/null; then
>                 cnf="$1/openssl-1.0.0.cnf"
>        else
>                cnf="$1/openssl.cnf"
> --
> 1.7.5.4
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Live Security Virtual Conference
> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
> _______________________________________________
> Openvpn-devel mailing list
> Openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-devel

Reply via email to