Hi Alon, 2012/3/24 Alon Bar-Lev <alon.bar...@gmail.com>: > On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 9:15 PM, Alon Bar-Lev <alon.bar...@gmail.com> wrote: >> PPC architectures and conflict with stdbool.h. >> >> basic.h defines a type 'bool' that conflicts with the altivec >> keyword bool which has to be fixed upstream, see bugs[1][2]. >> >> [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=293840 >> [2] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=297854
The approach attempted in [2], using stdbool.h, looks far less intrusive than renaming "bool" to "obool" everywhere, so why did you choose the latter approach? Jan Scholz's comment #6 [3] sounds like the right approach to me ... Cheers Fabian 3: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=297854#c6
